Mr. Pitts is correct in the context of the demeaning of the what is now called the N-word. I agree it should not be politically sanitized and printed. It is a travesty to hear so many Blacks, or African_Americans, banter this term about in everyday conversation as if it has no significance. What is equally egregious are the youth in schools, of all races and ethnicities, that use this word as easily enterchageably as fool.
I guess many of these op-ed columnists have never spent much time in the Deep South and heard both sides of the term. Some point to a derivation of Negrid, Negro or versions in dilaects meaning the color black. It must also be remembered that it was illegal, punishable by death, to teach a slave to read, write or about God. Some natives that were decendents of salves have also commented that the original term was for a white sympathizer. Thus, Quakers and other abolishonists would be caled N--... in the South. (I am self-editing the word to allow posting and to alleviate any profanity disclaimers.
Chris Rock says America has to grow up. Well, I guess he wants his children to view his historical contribution to their race a being minimized and the words have no meaning in the humorous context. Words hurt and using a negative word for Americans of any Black descent (not all Blacks from all parts of the world appreciate the African-American tag) is the same as calling a person with a disease or disability a nagative name.
The N-word can and should be placed in its proper historical and societal context and spelled out so there is no misinterpretation of which N-word is being discussed and its application. The acceptance as a colloquial slang is haunting every element of our society to bring civility and respect to oppressed people that are becoming part of the leadership.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |